Relying on the business section in newspapers on why the stock markets go up and down on any given day is like relying on astrologers to explain dark matter.
Everyone should be in Kansas these days, because Brownback’s real life trickle down economic experiment turns out to be an abject failure, not just hurting the poor, but the state itself as revenues are completely below sustainable. Trickle down economics is a paternalistic lie invented by the ultra-conservatives who claim that giving money to the rich benefits everyone. Well, besides modern day Kansas, we also know that wages for workers have stagnated and are below the 1970 levels, while income for CEOs has increased 10-100 times. We call it income inequality. Turns out, the rich (self described job creators) neither create jobs with their extra cash not paid to the public purse, nor do the jobs they create pay a living wage, which means many workers depend on state subsidies and federal tax credits, creating a viscous circle.
Do people understand the downward spiral for the public purse and the enrichment of the rich? If trickle down economics actually were the goal of conservatives, they would not resist calls to increase to minimum wage, since higher wages is exactly the idea of trickle down economics, where workers benefit from companies having more cash to invest. Well they do not invest in their workers, as the recent example of IBM makes clear, a company that spent 12 billion dollars to buy back its own shares, making shareholders happy and richer, while creating the illusion of improved business activity and income.
These are trying times for democrats. And I do not mean Democrats as opposed to Republicans, I mean democrats v autocrats. It seems the latter have the upper hand in the public imagination, since they have all the efficiency arguments on their side. No pesky opposition, no stalemate in Congress, no hustling for public approval. Putin rules by fiat having a rubber stamp cabinet and Duma, and best of all an overwhelming approval rating. (Hint: freedom of speech is rewarded by beatings and jail time.) And so does the Chinese Communist Party. Regrettably, the latter has all the Ism and zero Commune in its name. It’s all ideology of state power, lest chaos reigns. President and aspiring autocrat Xi praises millennial old monarchs and absolutist rulers, ranting against Western liberalism, branding them Western imports unfit for Chinese culture and minds. Funny how he makes these statements as proud defender of a Marxist-Leninist philosophy, which also is one of these pesky Western ideas imported to China by Chairman Mao. The latter incidentally condemned as decadent and feudal anything cultural and political originating ante 1949. Poor Xi.
My own father expressed sentiments for a benevolent dictator, who would render unnecessary the difficult and ubiquitous decision making and compromising, the hallmark of a vibrant and stable democracy. A benevolent dictator, of course, is expected to always rule the way you prefer decisions to be made. I remember to be shocked by his utterance, because he was also a proud Swiss, as any Swiss is proud of our history of democracy dating back to 1291. Well, it’s a complicated history, a bloody history, and a lopsided history of freedom, as women did not get their full rights as citizens until 1971, half a century after universal suffrage in the USA. Now the Swiss executive branch of government has a majority of women ministers.
Americans too, seem to doubt the value of their democracy as they hate Congress for being inefficient and ineffective, ranting against incumbents, yet reelecting them with utter consistency, despising their president, if he comes from the opposite party. Obama does not fare better than W a few years ago. The sentiment to impose one’s will on all the people is strong, fed by frustration about a complicated and diverse landscape of ideas and moral convictions. It’s hard work to govern as ‘We the People’, but it is work necessary to be done.
The way we search for answers and solutions is by way of defining a problem. If we get the problem wrong, we will never find the correct solution. So it goes with education reform, where the latest measure of success is economic outcome, not educational attainment. The symptoms of failing education by today’s education reform circles, however, are misdiagnosed. When I came to this country some twenty five years ago, the campus buildings were named after famous scientists, educators, civil rights activists and politicians that further democratic liberty and equality. Today, this honor goes to sponsors who pay multimillion dollar premiums to have their names splashed high sky over what is perceived as dismal education. In an age where we callously or naively set impossible goals – 100% proficiency and graduation rates as well as job guarantees (not mere prospects), the adulation of money over knowledge is the biggest threat to education. When people seriously contemplate eliminating algebra for a college education, because it is a stumbling block for degree seekers, where a degree is simply a needed paper for a job, not a testament of learning, then we caved in to the economic primacy over education.
As you come to live in this country, you will learn two things: that this is the land of the free and the land of the brave, but that freedom is neither limitless, nor is bravery required.